Three women and two men struck down DOMA today. On the bleakly positive side, it leaves the individual states free to determine the terms of marriages contracted within their
borders. On the seriously down side, the
court also in effect struck down a California law that would have defined
marriage as between one man and one woman, albeit on technical grounds.
It was disappointing.
We live in a disappointing culture.
There is a part of me that cannot even begin to fathom how much social
mores have changed. In the course of my
lifetime we’ve come from a society so discreet about sex that married couples
on TV had double beds to one where Two
and a Half Men survives—and thrives (and one in which parents would commit
a child to acting in the show to begin with); from a society where abortion was
illegal to one in which Kermit Gosnell is not even worthy of news
coverage. Not even a generation ago,
marriage as a union of man and woman was simply unquestioned. I am ashamed that it seems to be one of the
legacies of my generation that we laid the groundwork for that to be destroyed.
But here we are. The gauntlet has
been well and truly thrown and this will be a crucible for Christ’s Church in
the Unites States. In a way, I am
relieved to have the lines so clearly drawn.
The days and years ahead will be difficult but there is blessing in
clarity and vigor in challenge. I would
prefer not to be in utter conflict with the society around me but if that’s the
way it is to be, I’m ready, I think.
I’ve already picked out the refrigerator box I’ll be living in under the
bridge in a few years…..
A few semi-random observations/suggestions/predictions
First,
watch For Greater Glory and read the Power and the Glory. Then do it again. Then consider the recent riots in Brazil and
the riots in France and the violence against Christians in the Middle
East. Think it cannot happen here? Think again. We are not as civilized as we like to think.
Catholic
Churches will, in very short order, lose their tax-exempt status. That means that contributions made will no longer be tax deductible; will the lay faithful keep supporting the Church when it means giving after-tax dollars? It’s time for the best legal minds in the
country to start brainstorming about this and time for local diocese and
parishes to start restructuring so that we can survive the blow in the best way
possible. At some point that will inevitably mean
closing parishes and selling off treasures—unfortunate, but all things
pass. And in a way, that loss of tax
exemption will be a welcome release—too many pastors and too many bishops have
hedged their comments and their activity for fear of losing tax-exempt
status. Lose the status, loose the
tongues, I hope.
Don’t
look for too much support from most Protestant churches as time passes and
social pressure increases. Just as they
all fell in line with the Episcopal Church after Lambeth in 1930, finding
contraception perfectly acceptable when it has previously universally been
considered sinful, expect a good many Protestant ecclesial bodies to do the
same on the issue of same sex unions as social, political and tax pressures
increase. And the Church in America must
prepare for another American schism.
Just as there were Catholics who broke from the Church over Vatican II,
there will be those who break from the Church over this. This time, however, the schismatics will have
the full force of government and society with them and they will have a great
deal of power and presence. They will
use it. In this prevailing culture it is
they who will be viewed as legitimate, not those faithful to Rome.
It’s
time for parishioners to recognize that it is now going to be socially very
dangerous to be Catholic. Fish, fellow
Catholics, or cut bait.
Martyrdom—probably not physical, but very likely both social and economic, awaits a good
many of us. That means that this is a
time for great spiritual preparation, and the Church gives us the means to
prepare. It is time for clear public
witness from the faithful in the pew in their everyday lives. No need to pick fights but polite silence to
go along and get along is no longer a viable option. It never really was.
It’s
time for priests and deacons to stop signing marriage certificates for the
state. If Catholic clergy do not participate at all in marriage from the state’s perspective, they cannot
discriminate in that regard. That closes
one avenue of legal oppression. For
generations, Europe had civil marriage and religious marriage and the two had
little to do with each other. It is time
for the Church in America to eschew any participation in marriage as defined by
the state, and concentrate on the sacrament of matrimony, something separate
and unique and sacred. Something beyond
the reach of the state, at least for now.
Maybe it’s
time for the Church to consider the possibility of simply ignoring any
“marriage”, whether secular or in a Protestant ecclesial body, as irrelevant to
whether two adults can receive the sacrament of matrimony. The presumption of validity of a marriage of
two Christians outside the Church can reasonably be replaced at this point in
history by a presumption of invalidity if there has not been prior recognition
of the marriage as valid by the Church.
Neither the state nor any Protestant church views marriage as the
Catholic Church does, and neither has for a long time. It is reasonable to believe that even
baptized Christians who enter into marriage outside the Church don’t do so
intending what the Church intends in matrimony.
It’s
long past time for pastors to be clearly and vigorously preaching about the faith (all of it—even
the hard teachings), regularly and with love, not minding the potential to offend
those in the pews and not concerned with the loss of revenue. God does not
expect us to be well funded or popular.
He expects us to be faithful.
Catholics cannot practice what they do not understand and after 50 years
of poor catechesis, many don’t really know what is expected of them. They really
don’t know that to live a Catholic life is to life differently than the world—and
differently than their Protestant brothers and sisters. How can one be on fire for a faith one really
doesn’t know? How can one defend it?
It’s
really time for the Bishops to take visible
action against those in the public arena who dissent from Church teaching on
marriage and life. It will make no difference to those dissident Catholics who
flaunt Church teaching in their public lives, but standing firm against them,
in public, would edify the faithful who have been long demoralized and
scandalized.
It’s
time for the lay faithful to support pastors in appropriately clear and
rigorous pre-Cana preparation (that includes you, Moms and Dads). No winks and nods to cohabiting
couples or those who enter matrimony intending to contracept or considering
matrimony a trial to be ended if it doesn’t suit their fancy after a few years.
Yes, this will make a lot of people (mostly mothers and brides intent on a big
church wedding) angry. Yes, there will
be fewer who receive the sacrament of matrimony in the Church. But there will be far more sacramental
unions.
While we
are at it, we might consider in very concrete, personal, communal, and lasting terms how to assist young families in living a
solidly Catholic life after they are married.
If we as Catholics really believe in the sanctity of matrimony, we must
start living it vibrantly, expecting that others do so as well, and we must,
as a community, assist each other in very tangible ways. At all stages of the sacramental life.
There
will be an increasing number of jobs that Catholics will not be able to take if
they wish to remain faithful to the Church.
Medicine is already rapidly becoming a no-man’s land for Catholics. Ob-Gyn and Family Practice residents are pressured to prescribe
contraceptives and there have been (so far unsuccessful) movements to force residents and nurses involved in women's health care to perform, assist at, and/or view abortions regardless of
their moral convictions. The American
Academy of Pediatrics has now announced that pediatricians should help
eradicate “homophobia,” that is, teach acceptance of the gay lifestyle. Law schools can be expected to become
(increasingly) intolerant of discussion that in any way impugns the homosexual
agenda that has been codified in law.
Catholics who are faithful to Church teaching can expect to be
marginalized economically as the society becomes increasingly intolerant of
their kind of diversity. Being Catholic
might just mean being poor one of these days. Parents--this means rethinking the conventional wisdom about what success means and talking about it with your children. You can be sure that society is not going to tell them about the conflicts they will face.
Remember:
this isn’t the first time the Church has faced challenges like this. It won’t be the last. But this is our time, and either we rise to face the challenge or we don’t: our
choice, our will. At one time the Church
in Ephesus was a thriving community; now there is no Christian community there
at all. Christ promised the Gates of
Hell would not prevail against His Church.
He didn’t say how big, how powerful, or how comfortable it would be, or
even where it would be when He returned. In fact, I recall His musing about whether He
would find faith at all when he came again.
I am disappointed. I
am angry that this has happened. I am
not looking forward to the coming years, and I hope against hope that my dismal
predictions do not come true. But even
when I consider that they might, I find, curiously, that I am not afraid. That is, perhaps, the only surprising thing about this whole turn of events.
I am a bit worried about the details, maybe—no one likes
forced change, especially uncomfortable change.
I’d prefer an easier way, but I remember something about a cross. For many years now, my life has been
remarkably cross-free. Looks like a big
one just got delivered. Best pick it up
and start walking towards Jerusalem.if I do, I will be in good company.
http://blog.adw.org/2013/06/do-we-need-to-set-aside-the-word-marriage-and-use-holy-matrimony-exclusively/
ReplyDeleteLove, Lindsay