So they made signs, asking his father what he wished him to be called.
He asked for a tablet and wrote, “John is his name,” and all were amazed. Immediately his mouth was opened, his tongue freed, and he spoke blessing God.
Sometimes the oddest things jump
out at me from the readings. Today it
was this bit from the naming of John the Baptist. Casting my mind back a few weeks to the start
of the story, I remembered the circumstances of Zechariah’s unfortunate
silence:
The angel
answered him, "I am Gabriel, who stands in the presence of God. I was sent
to speak to you, and to bring you this good news. Behold, you will be silent and not able to speak, until the day that these
things will happen, because you didn't believe my words, which will be
fulfilled in their proper time."
Note, please,
that Gabriel did not tell him he would be deaf until the child was born—just
mute. For that reason, it struck me
unreasonably funny—grinning inappropriately in the middle of the Gospel reading
funny—that the people around him didn’t just talk to Zechariah. His ears were working just fine. Even when Gabriel spoke to him, Zechariah
heard what was said, he just couldn’t believe it.
I suppose there
are a lot of reasons why Zechariah was struck dumb, but it seems to me it was a
time-honored spiritual discipline: cultivating exterior silence. When we stop talking, it shakes up our
relations with each other and with ourselves. When we stop talking, we lose
power over others, and ourselves. Not to
be able to talk is to be helpless…..
When we stop talking, when we are helpless, there’s at least a chance
we’ll start listening.
I went through a
period when I was unable to talk for three long weeks—far less than nine long
months. I remember my initial
frustration at not being part of community; so much of what passes for human
interaction is mediated by speech. And I
remember extreme frustration at not being able to make myself understood. Writing took so long and signing was
imperfect at best. And I remember
blinding rage at two kinds of folks—the ones who simply ignored that I was
under strict orders not to talk and would still ask me questions—and those who
simply figured that, because I couldn’t talk, I didn’t exist. And I remember how dependent I was on those
around me, to include me, to understand me, to help me. Even so, I never much got past the irritation
stage….
Personally, I
think Zechariah showed great restraint.
I’d have written I can
hear! before I wrote his name is John. But that’s because it seems to me he had more time to
enter into that silence and learn from it.
He’d grown, if you will, another set of ears in the process, ears that
hears more sharply than the ones he’d been gifted with at birth. And his hearing became very focused in the
process. The misunderstandings of others
were not going to distract him from Him he knew and what he knew and what he knew he had to say,
once he could talk again.
Zechariah was no
dummy. As a priest of the Israelite
people, he understood as well as any and better than most the long and powerful
history of God working among his people, even—especially—stories of barrenness
made fertile by the Word of God. I’m
willing to spot him faith in the grand sense, faith in the great scheme of
things. What he lacked, it seems, was
faith in the small details. Zechariah
was like a scientist that gets the theory just fine, but can’t quite manage to
put it into practical terms. Faith that
God was going to work with him, here and now in what had to be the fondest,
most shattered dream of his heart, the desire for a son.
And I know for a
fact he responded exactly as I would have—as I did, in fact, under the same
circumstances—how can I know this? In
other words, I believe you can do this,
but how will I know that you have? Faith in the large sense, doubt in the small
sense. Always looking for signs are we
of little faith.
Contrast that
with Mary: How can this be since I know
not man? Mary’s answer seems
suffused with bewilderment, not doubt; bewilderment precisely because she
believes it can be done because God wills it.
She doesn’t ask for a sign, but an explanation. And that she hears from Gabriel himself.
Zechariah asked
for a sign but he got none—instead he entered into silence, which seems to be
God’s go-to response when we ask the wrong question at the wrong time and
demand proof instead of faith. Faith is,
after all, always the condition
precedent and proof is never enough. Zechariah
got silence from God on the subject at hand and silence in his life. The only signs he got seem to be from his
friends and family trying hard to enter into the silence of his life through
those signs, and getting it all wrong in the bargain, missing what was the problem
in the first place. Not his ears, but
his heart; not his tongue so much as his faith.
That’s the
problem with signs. Too easy to
misinterpret, and if you’re a lawyer like me, it’s far too easy to argue either
side of the issue, come up with competing and mutually exclusive explanations. And, because I am a quick study, I’ve got the
lines from the Father of Lies down pat.
God’s lines are harder to hear, because they’re spoken in silence. Like Zechariah, I think I have an
intellectual handle on faith, but also like him, I falter in the details
because I so very much want to understand so that I can believe. I want to make sense of the things that are
happening to me, and I can’t. I can’t
. I could try to explain why I can’t but
that would just perpetuate the problem.
Perhaps I need
to remember like Zechariah the benefits of silence. Of learning through that interior quiet what
Mary knew at the very outset: faith begets understanding, not the other way
around. And signs, they’ll lead you astray
unless you see them with the eyes of faith.
But there’s hope
for Zechariah and for me. With God there
always is, always a way to get us where we need to be, either by lead or by
goad or sometimes, both.
I was struck,
too, by the fact that Zechariah didn’t get his voice back when John was born;
that would have been a reasonable interpretation of Gabriel’s words and quite
an honest way of interpreting the sign of being struck dumb, if sign it were. I have to wonder whether Zechariah was
disappointed when he first held his son in his arms and he remained
mute. Perhaps he doubted again, perhaps
he thought he had misunderstood, perhaps he wanted another sign? Or perhaps, after his season of silence, he
was content to wait in faith, content to let God be God with His own seasons
and times. I think it must have been the
latter.
It was eight
days later, when John was being circumcised that Zechariah regained his voice,
and not then until he had the opportunity to write in faith what he had doubted
in his mind: His name is John. God did exactly what God said he would do and
Zechariah, after his silence, was
prepared to give witness to that reality, voice or no voice.
And at that, his
tongue was loosened and the first thing he did was give thanks to God. Just like Mary, once Zechariah’s faith caught
up with him, his first act was to praise God.
Mary did it right away, Zechariah nine months and eight days later—but
they both did it. Important lesson:
faith ultimately begets praise. And
perhaps, when I feel my faith faltering, I will remember that praise also
begets faith.
Faith first,
then understanding, sometimes slowly, painfully, in fits and starts. Sometimes in silence.
I'm finally finding a time to read this, as I look at the Advent candles, lit one more time, behind my computer. "Silence is golden" is not just some phrase, as witnessed by God Himself, it is a golden time to ponder. And, in the adoration chapel, a great blessing we have.
ReplyDeleteI thank God for my blessings this morning, family, friends, and (having read A Woman's Place blog) electricity.
May you and yours have a very blessed Christmas day.